<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rockies find right lineup, need to stick with it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rmindependent.com/2009/09/rockies-find-right-lineup-need-to-stick-with-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rmindependent.com/2009/09/rockies-find-right-lineup-need-to-stick-with-it/</link>
	<description>Denver news from a different perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:20:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Foster</title>
		<link>http://www.rmindependent.com/2009/09/rockies-find-right-lineup-need-to-stick-with-it/comment-page-1/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kclstudios.com/rmi/?p=15110#comment-146</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s no question Barmes is better defensively than Young, but EY has been solid at second since he came up and even made a couple plays going to his right I didn&#039;t think he could make. The problem with Barmes isn&#039;t just that he&#039;s not hitting. It&#039;s that so many of his at-bats have been complete blanks. He&#039;s always been vulnerable to the breaking ball low and outside, but a couple times in the past week all he has seen is that pitch and he still chased it. If he had better at-bats, working pitchers and moving runners over, you could side with this defense over EY&#039;s. But for now, even the missed double play you mention is balanced by the much better offense. Until EY is outright costing games with his defense, I much prefer to see him at second.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no question Barmes is better defensively than Young, but EY has been solid at second since he came up and even made a couple plays going to his right I didn&#8217;t think he could make. The problem with Barmes isn&#8217;t just that he&#8217;s not hitting. It&#8217;s that so many of his at-bats have been complete blanks. He&#8217;s always been vulnerable to the breaking ball low and outside, but a couple times in the past week all he has seen is that pitch and he still chased it. If he had better at-bats, working pitchers and moving runners over, you could side with this defense over EY&#8217;s. But for now, even the missed double play you mention is balanced by the much better offense. Until EY is outright costing games with his defense, I much prefer to see him at second.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robb Ruyle</title>
		<link>http://www.rmindependent.com/2009/09/rockies-find-right-lineup-need-to-stick-with-it/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Robb Ruyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kclstudios.com/rmi/?p=15110#comment-144</guid>
		<description>Generally agree with your analysis, but concerned with EY&#039;s defense.  I think Barmes turns the DP on the feed from Tulo last night.  EY&#039;s pivot looked slow, and he didn&#039;t get much on the throw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generally agree with your analysis, but concerned with EY&#8217;s defense.  I think Barmes turns the DP on the feed from Tulo last night.  EY&#8217;s pivot looked slow, and he didn&#8217;t get much on the throw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

